But plaintiff’s claim that he was retaliated against for raising religious objections to the training, and discriminated against based on religion as to promotion, can go forward.
State Employer’s Requiring Employees to Watch “Antiracist”/”Gender Identity” Videos Isn’t Unconstitutional Speech Compulsion
Date:
More like thisRelated
DC Circuit Finds Some FINRA Authority Violates Private Nondelegation Doctrine
The private nondelegation doctrine is getting an increasing amount...
The Math on Mass Deportation Doesn’t Add Up
Flawed calculations and overlooked benefits show why Trump's immigration...
Today in Supreme Court History: November 24, 2001
11/24/2001: Salim Hamdan was captured in Afghanistan. The Supreme...